“Our margins are fine on paper but we're always out of cash - who do I hire?”
The highest-intent sentence a consultant will read on Reddit, because the last four words concede that hiring is the answer. Budget exists by definition — a cash-conversion problem is expensive to leave alone and the poster knows it. Authority sits with the person typing, since nobody else in the company would phrase it as "who do I hire". Urgency is real but not panicked. Answer the mechanism first: margin is an accounting statement and cash is a timing statement, and the gap between them has three or four usual causes.
“How do I find someone to help me systemise this before I burn out?”
Budget is unstated and secondary; the constraint is the founder's own capacity, which is running out on a schedule they can feel. That makes this urgent in a way a revenue problem often is not. Decision authority is absolute — this is a person spending their own money on their own exhaustion. The trap is quoting a systems project. The opening they are actually offering is a diagnosis of which of their tasks are genuinely non-delegable, which is short work and reliably becomes a larger engagement.
“Is a consultant worth it at our size or is it just a deck?”
Not a lead yet, and treating it as one loses it. This is a purchase-scepticism post: budget probably exists, urgency is low, and the poster is looking for permission to either spend or stop thinking about it. The comment that wins is the one that answers honestly, including the sizes and situations where the answer is no. Reddit rewards that disproportionately, and the poster remembers who was straight with them when the situation changes.
“Need help pricing a service business, willing to pay”
"Willing to pay" is a budget statement, and its presence in a Reddit post is a deliberate signal — the poster has seen enough free-advice threads to know they need to mark themselves as serious. The scope is narrow and stated, so the engagement is small and fast, and it is the cheapest possible way for a stranger to test you. Price it as a discrete piece of work, deliver it properly, and treat it as an audition rather than a project.
“We hired a consultant and got a PDF - how do I avoid that?”
Budget is proven, because it has already been spent once. Urgency is low and trust is negative — this post exists to warn other people, not to hire anyone, and every consultant who replies with a pitch confirms the poster's thesis in public. Authority is clear: they signed the last contract. The only reply that works describes what makes a deliverable get used rather than filed, in enough operational detail that the poster can tell you have been on the wrong side of it too.
“Looking for someone who's actually run one of these”
Budget and urgency are both unstated, and neither is the point. The poster is filtering for operating experience over advisory credentials, and the word "actually" is doing all the work — they have already been pitched by someone who had not. Decision authority is usually theirs. Lead with the specific thing you ran, the number it moved, and what you got wrong doing it; a credential list here reads as exactly the profile they are screening out.